“The plain fact is that the planet does not need more successful people.
But it does desperately need more peacemakers, healers, restorers,
storytellers, and lovers of every kind. It needs people who live well in
their places. It needs people of moral courage willing to join the
fight to make the world habitable and humane. And these qualities have
little to do with success as we have defined it.” ― David Orr, Ecological Literacy
Yes, our planet doesn't need more successful people because the
society's definition of "success" is anti-Earth and anti-humanity, since
people's competition for more wealth, possession, recognition, social
status, etc only serves to create division and discrimination among
humankind as well as over-exploit natural resources and cause
environmental degradation and species extinction.
It is more important
and sane to seek to make the world habitable and humane through
championing equal rights and promoting freedom and peace as well as
working towards environment conservation. Like what David Orr said,
these qualities have little to do with the society's definition of
"success".
“I think the greatest people in (our) society carve niches that
represent the unique expression of their combination of talent.” Neil deGrasse Tyson